Press Releases

Panitch Schwarze to Remain as Litigation Counsel for Patent Owner

WILMINGTON, Del. (November 2016) -  Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel partners Fred A. Tecce and Dennis J. Butler successfully defended a motion to disqualify the firm from representing a patent owner in a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Judge Christopher J. Burke ruled that Panitch Schwarze’s prior representation of the defendant in the case, Munchkin Inc., in trademark matters did not disqualify the firm from representing the plaintiff, Regalo International LLC, in a patent dispute related to bedrail products.  Judge Burke determined that the bedrail patent litigation was not “‘substantially related’ to Panitch’s prior representations of Munchkin in unrelated trademark matters,” reasoning, “if generalized citation to counsel’s knowledge of a prior client’s ‘litigation philosophies,’  ‘strategies’ and ‘risk tolerances’ necessarily demonstrated that the past representations were ‘substantially related’ to any new matter where an attorney is adverse to the prior client, the floodgates for disqualification would open wide.”  (Citing Cf. Vestron, Inc. v. Nat’l Geographic Soc., 750 F. Supp. 586, 595 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)).

Tecce and Butler both are veteran patent litigation attorneys.  Tecce has successfully handled cases on behalf of intellectual property owners, and in defense of charges of infringement and misappropriation in industries such as consumer products and appliances, medical devices, juvenile products, building materials, cosmetics, aircraft manufacturing, telecommunications, artificial turf and other technologies.

Butler’s practice also focuses on patent litigation on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants.  He has worked on cases involving a wide variety of technologies, including medical devices, composite materials, firearm accessories, software, business methods and banking processes.

Contact Us



By checking this box, I agree to the terms and conditions outlined on our Disclaimer page.
Email Disclaimer

Sending an email to our office does not create an attorney-client relationship, and none will be formed unless there is an expressed agreement between the firm and the client. Thus, we strongly advise against sending confidential or privileged information to us until you can establish such a relationship. Furthermore, we advise against sending privileged or confidential information through email at all, since we can in no way ensure the security of your email. In fact, neither this website nor the email system involved is encrypted, so you should not assume that your email is confidential. We cannot guarantee that someone else will not see it.

Do you agree to this Email Disclaimer?

I Agree I Do Not Agree